The opposition party is demanding accountability from President Cyril Ramaphosa regarding the discovery of $580 000 at his Phala Phala farm four years prior. The case has gripped the nation, with the EFF asserting that Ramaphosa must answer for the funds found.

During the proceedings, President Ramaphosa's legal representative contended that the National Assembly's rejection of the Section 89 independent panel report was justified, citing fundamental flaws in the report.

The legal debate intensified as Advocate Geoff Budlender, speaking for Ramaphosa, maintained that his client had no intention of contravening the law.

Budlender's argument hinged on the interpretation of 'paid work' related to Ramaphosa's farming activities, which have been public knowledge, notably through a published book showcasing the cattle breed of his interest.

--SABC/ChannelAfrica--