At the heart of the legal challenge lies the presidential proclamation of additional voting days and alleged irregularities by the Electoral Commission of Namibia (ECN). 

Political Scientist and Sociologist Professor Henning Melber from Stellenbosch University has described the situation as deeply concerning, highlighting potential violations of the electoral law and the Constitution. Speaking to journalist Lulu Gaboo, Melber pointed out significant flaws in the election process.  

"The elections were scheduled for November 27, but due to technical issues, the president unilaterally extended voting to November 29 and 30, selectively reopening certain voting stations. This decision, which disproportionately favoured regions dominated by the ruling SWAPO party, raises serious questions about its legality," he explained.  

Opposition parties argue that such selective extensions undermine the fairness of the election. They have called for a comparative analysis of the results from the original election day with those from the extended days. Observers have criticised the lack of robust action from international monitoring missions, which they claim downplayed the constitutional concerns.  

Melber also noted Namibia’s previously strong democratic reputation, which has now been significantly tarnished. "Namibia was regarded as a model for free and fair elections in Africa. This case has severely damaged that reputation and created frustration among citizens who feel betrayed by the system," he said.  


--ChannelAfrica--