This move has sparked significant pushback from civil society groups, who are questioning both the transparency and integrity of the system.

For the first time, Smartmatic will be used in Malawi, replacing the country’s traditional manual method of transmitting election results. While smaller elections have previously relied on this manual process, many feel that introducing a digital system may introduce new risks, particularly regarding potential manipulation.

Joseph Peshi, the Chair of the Malawi Civil Society Organisation Coalition (MCSOC), raised concerns about the lack of oversight in the system. “We’ve already seen multiple irregularities in the voter registration process, including missing names and centres. Now, with Smartmatic, we fear even greater problems, including possible result manipulation,” Peshi stated.

One of the biggest points of contention is the absence of independent auditors for the Smartmatic system, which has left many questioning the reliability of the results. “Without proper auditing, how can we trust the election process? It’s vital that we ensure transparency,” Peshi added.

While the government argues that Smartmatic will bring efficiency and modernity to the election process, civil society groups are sceptical. “Malawians deserve to know how their elections are being managed,” Peshi asserted, highlighting the importance of public access to information.

In response to these concerns, MCSOC has given the MEC a deadline of seven days to reconsider its use of Smartmatic. If no action is taken, the coalition warns of mass protests. “We will not stand by and watch our democracy be undermined,” Peshi warned, urging citizens to raise their voices.

The controversy surrounding Smartmatic is made even more pressing by recent violence in Mozambique, which was linked to election results processed through the system. Peshi and his colleagues fear similar unrest in Malawi if these concerns are not addressed.

--ChannelAfrica--