By Sherwin Bryce-Pease

The resolution, tabled in response to the ongoing humanitarian crisis in the Palestinian territory, called on all parties to halt hostilities without conditions. It also urged the immediate and dignified release of all hostages and the full, unrestricted entry of humanitarian aid into Gaza, along with the restoration of essential services.

However, Washington argued that the proposal was flawed. US officials criticised the draft for failing to explicitly condemn Hamas, the group behind the October 7 attack that sparked the current conflict. They also expressed concern that the resolution would undermine ongoing diplomatic efforts led by the US to secure a truce as part of a broader hostage deal.

Defending its position, the US cited Israel’s right to self-defence and warned that the resolution might embolden Hamas to launch further attacks. Officials further raised the alarm over the possibility that unrestricted aid deliveries could be misused by Hamas for military or political advantage.

The decision has drawn sharp criticism from several Security Council members and humanitarian organisations, who argue that the situation in Gaza is deteriorating rapidly, with civilians bearing the brunt of the violence and aid restrictions.

--ChannelAfrica--