And the decision to extend the election period.
The extension came after a series of challenges, including a technical glitch in the electoral system and high voter turnout at several polling stations, which made it impossible for all citizens to vote on time. These issues prompted the outgoing President Nangolo Mbumba to issue a decree extending the election period, a decision that is now under scrutiny.
Experts explained that the extension was based on constitutional powers vested in the president. These powers allowed for adjustments to the election schedule to ensure all citizens could cast their ballots. However, the IPC argues that the extension undermined the integrity of the election process. They contend that some polling stations lacked sufficient voting materials, including ballot papers, while voters were allegedly moved between stations, putting pressure on the Electoral Commission.
The legal challenge, now before Namibia’s Supreme Court, could have far-reaching implications for the legitimacy of the election. If the court sides with the IPC, the entire election could be nullified, necessitating a rerun. However, the outcome will depend on the evidence presented in court and the interpretation of electoral laws.
The Landless People’s Movement ,another opposition party, has also applied to join the case. They have voiced similar concerns about irregularities in the voting process, particularly the late arrival of ballots at certain stations. As part of the legal proceedings, they will need to substantiate their claims before the court.
On the ground, Namibians demonstrated a strong commitment to exercising their democratic rights. Despite delays, voters showed remarkable patience, with some waiting for hours to cast their votes. The election marked a historic moment with Nandi Ndaitwa becoming Namibia’s first female president. Her victory, within the context of the country’s fight against apartheid, resonated deeply with the electorate, particularly youth and those seeking reforms in governance, education, and employment.
As the legal proceedings continue, the future of Namibia’s democratic process hangs in the balance. The court’s decision could set a precedent for how electoral disputes are handled in the future, with the hope that the rule of law will prevail, safeguarding the will of the people.
--ChannelAfrica--